American Grand Worlds bid

Date: Sun Dec 17 10:54 PM, 2006

RE: American Grand Worlds bid

Date: Sun Dec 17 10:55 PM, 2006

I dont think that Cali small seniors got one. Were you there. I talked to a girl on the team and she was upset and said they did not get one.

Date: Sun Dec 17 10:59 PM, 2006

Nor Cal Cheer Gal wrote:

I dont think that Cali small seniors got one. Were you there. I talked to a girl on the team and she was upset and said they did not get one.

They got a bid.

Date: Sun Dec 17 11:01 PM, 2006

Then why would she say that they did not get one. I spoke to her face to face and she was upset and crying.

Date: Sun Dec 17 11:02 PM, 2006

Nor Cal Cheer Gal wrote:

Then why would she say that they did not get one. I spoke to her face to face and she was upset and crying.

It was a mistake. Call her back, I"m sure she's much happier now.

Date: Sun Dec 17 11:03 PM, 2006

Bids wrote:

International:
Cheerforce Rockiez (open coed)
Cheerforce Alcatraz (large junior)

Paid:
Cheerforce Diamondz
GA large coed

Unpaid:
California coed
Cheer Athletics large
South Jersey Storm
California small

Congrats to everyone!

WAY TO GO CF! THREE BIDS!

Someone said that CA Jags Sm Srs got a bid. Is that the bid that would have been passed down from SJS? Because how could they give a bid to 2nd place if there is a question on the boards about Cali Sm Sr not getting a bid? They go by highest scores. So the first place team would have to get a bid before a 2nd place team.

Date: Mon Dec 18 8:31 AM, 2006

Bids wrote:

Someone said that CA Jags Sm Srs got a bid. Is that the bid that would have been passed down from SJS? Because how could they give a bid to 2nd place if there is a question on the boards about Cali Sm Sr not getting a bid? They go by highest scores. So the first place team would have to get a bid before a 2nd place team.

From what I heard this was originally some kind of mistake. Jags thought they had gotten the bid and California's small thought they didn't. Then that mistake was fixed and California got the bid. But I would be curious to see who is next in line in the scores, because SJS's bid has to go somewhere. I'm guessing it'll be Jags or GA's limited coed.

Date: Mon Dec 18 8:42 AM, 2006

AC Watcher,

Thanks for keeping us updated on AC. It was great getting all the updates throughout the competition! Great job on the commentaries too.

Can't wait to see where that last unpaid bid gets handed down.

Date: Mon Dec 18 1:27 PM, 2006

Next teams in line... for bids

-Jags
-NCE
-Brandon
-whos next in line in sm coed...

3/6 of the bids were given to large coed teams so it seems like thats the high scoring division. my precition would be NCE or brandon. only because jags unfortunatly had so many mistakes. nce hit a solid routine both days, no drops a few touches even with loosing a main flyer and i believe brandon dropped cant really remember but they have amazing skill for only 20 people on that team.

Date: Mon Dec 18 1:32 PM, 2006

Do you have the scores for these teams that you say are the next in line for the passed bid? That is the only way to tell who is next in line.

Date: Mon Dec 18 1:33 PM, 2006

I just wanted to say that you guys really surprised me. After a shaky beginning of the season...I wasn't sure how ya'll would look. I was really impressed at your progress. And to lose a main flyer, and come back strong with a smile on your face. Congratulations to all of you and good luck the rest of the season!

Date: Mon Dec 18 1:37 PM, 2006

It's got to be between Jags and GA limited coed, and I would lean a lot towards GA. I don't have any scores but there were big drop-offs in skill level in each division - in small senior it was after Jags, in limited coed it was after GA, in large senior it was after Panthers, and in unlimited coed it was after SJS. I would imagine that there were big big point gaps in those spots. It was the point where teams went from squad standing-2-to-fulls to squad standing-2-to-tucks, etc.

Date: Mon Dec 18 1:38 PM, 2006

Yes, good job NCE. I'm really glad to know you were able to keep your focus. It couldn't have been easy under the circumstances.

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:39 PM, 2006

I think that they had made a mistake calling out the unpaid bids. They called out SJS (who already had a bid) instead of California Small Senior. The bids should have been:

Paid:
Georgia Large Coed
CheerForce Small Coed

Unpaid:
Cheer Athletics Large Senior (Panthers)
California Small Senior
California Large Coed
Cheer Athletics Small Senior (Jags)

International (also unpaid)
CheerForce Int. Coed
CheerForce Int. Junior

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:43 PM, 2006

what about crossovers?

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:44 PM, 2006

Do they give out Grand Champion awards or anything like that? I was wondering who had the highest score of the competition in each division.

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:46 PM, 2006

wait... wrote:

what about crossovers?

Most companies allow crossovers. It is just that Worlds doesn't allow it. So if any of these teams have crossovers they are going to have to make some tough decisions about who is going or who is going to be taken off a team.

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:59 PM, 2006

yea wrote:

Next teams in line... for bids

-Jags
-NCE
-Brandon
-whos next in line in sm coed...

3/6 of the bids were given to large coed teams so it seems like thats the high scoring division. my precition would be NCE or brandon. only because jags unfortunatly had so many mistakes. nce hit a solid routine both days, no drops a few touches even with loosing a main flyer and i believe brandon dropped cant really remember but they have amazing skill for only 20 people on that team.

I am kind of upset because Jags didn't make many mistakes. Granted, a girl busted and got hurt. Their stunts stuck like they did the 1st day. It was awesome, and everything looked great other than the parts the girl couldn't do. Personally I think their routine was in a league of their own. I still hope they can get a bid.

Date: Mon Dec 18 3:59 PM, 2006

AC Watcher wrote:

It's got to be between Jags and GA limited coed, and I would lean a lot towards GA. I don't have any scores but there were big drop-offs in skill level in each division - in small senior it was after Jags, in limited coed it was after GA, in large senior it was after Panthers, and in unlimited coed it was after SJS. I would imagine that there were big big point gaps in those spots. It was the point where teams went from squad standing-2-to-fulls to squad standing-2-to-tucks, etc.

AC scoresheets are not broken down into skill but just one overall score and there is no longer a tech merit score. If there was CA would of won both divisions, not just one.

Date: Mon Dec 18 4:50 PM, 2006

The scores are still based on skill level. There are no longer bonus points, but the scores are broken down by level and skills that *should* be seen at that level - multiple fulls and double fulls, etc. I've scored for AC this year and skills still count. I might even have a sheet around here somewhere that explains how. If I can find it, I'll give you the gist of it.