CA Bullets

Date: Mon Nov 13 8:58 AM, 2006

RE: CA Bullets

Date: Mon Nov 13 9:18 AM, 2006

I didn't see anything negative.

Date: Mon Nov 13 9:24 AM, 2006

Yeah I went back to read your post I didn't see anything negative either.

Date: Mon Nov 13 9:29 AM, 2006

Nope nothin negative that I could see.

Date: Mon Nov 13 10:00 AM, 2006

Maybe it was not negative maybe a little more of an insinuation that Cheerforce beat CA coed, I do not like it when teams make assumptions, unless they give out scores you cannot assume anything.

Date: Mon Nov 13 10:13 AM, 2006

Quick question wrote:

When cheerforce jr's won the choreography award was it just for the junior division or was it overall. Because if it was overall then does that mean they scored higher then the lg senior coed level 5 ?

It appears that this poster was not at the comp and this does not seem to be in any way an insinuation , just a simple question.

Date: Mon Nov 13 11:46 AM, 2006

THe comp at Irvine was definetly one to Behold

Definetly a wake up call for CA

Large senior was good, lots of potential there, especially considering the amount of guys, but still very sloppy they were. and ill agree with alotof other ppl last year was better
i think i counted something like only 10 standing backs for the squad
im sorry but in a large coed level 5 full squad tucks are basically REQUIRED to be largely competitive.

Large jr, definetly stepped up, very classic choreography amazing save in that pyramid but CF definetly brought their A- Game, Amazing choreography VERY different. Shawn over theres got a killer team that tumbling sequence is insane and the opening stunts gave me chills

Date: Mon Nov 13 12:07 PM, 2006

I Think wrote:

Maybe it was not negative maybe a little more of an insinuation that Cheerforce beat CA coed, I do not like it when teams make assumptions, unless they give out scores you cannot assume anything.

You're right, it's bad to assume. No one has said what CA coed's score was, so how can you know who outscored who? Plus, those 2 teams were in different divisons.

The only "apples to apples" score comparison would be to know the scores of both CA lg junior-5 and Cheerforce lg junior-5. Same division, same judges.

Personally, it looked to me like CA lg junior-5 & Lg coed were holding back and had "watered down" their routines, for whatever reason. I can't wait to see them in Las Vegas with their "full-out" routines. Hopefully we'll see a great re-match between CA and Cheerforce.

Date: Mon Nov 13 12:16 PM, 2006

does anyone know who was the last tumbling pass? on ca
was is jeff from sbe?

Date: Mon Nov 13 12:51 PM, 2006

the last tumbling pass is jeff from SBE and the last 3 before him are the 3 other boys from NCE .. i think cameron might be last now but before it was jeff

Date: Mon Nov 13 12:59 PM, 2006

10 Standing backs? look again, full squad toe backs..... CA COED

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:24 PM, 2006

oh i love how so much talent comes from our team

work it jeff, megan, x, cam and brett

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:31 PM, 2006

CF's score was a 97

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:34 PM, 2006

did bullets sm sr go?
OBSESSED! they rock my sox

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:40 PM, 2006

Bullets Coed got a 99%

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:44 PM, 2006

?? wrote:

10 Standing backs? look again, full squad toe backs..... CA COED

NO I just looked again and there was 8 people on that squad that did a tuck jump.

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:54 PM, 2006

OK, what is it you are looking at to see CAs jump tucks? Is cheerforce on there too? Where are these scores from? They are not consistent with some other info. I believe the choreography award was for all levels and divisions, but that is just choreography, right? This is getting a bit bizarre!

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:57 PM, 2006

Personally, it looked to me like CA lg junior-5 & Lg coed were holding back and had "watered down" their routines, for whatever reason. I can't wait to see them in Las Vegas with their "full-out" routines. Hopefully we'll see a great re-match between CA and Cheerforce.

********************************************************************
I do not believe the watering down part at all. I counted 4 boys doing double fulls along with 1 girl. the rest of the passes were slow fulls and one body plant.

One toe touch to a tuck with 8 tuck jumpers and a face plant.

Opening sequence= 14 tumblers, 4 kids with 2 to a tuck 6 kids with 2 to a full,and 4 boys with 2 to a double which 2 of collided with each other and hit the ground.

CA. juniors were by far the best CA team there.

Date: Mon Nov 13 1:58 PM, 2006

CA Coed has full toe touch back tucks and like 22 doubles and at least 15 standing fulls. They will be a great team this year in this I have no doubt. The kids are so close on that team and they all look out for each other. When you have a team of people that mesh well the end result is usually fantastic. Also, the last tumbling pass belongs to Jeff and he looked great, the team is very proud of him and in all of our members. The tumbling pass before Jeff is Dobby and he has never been to SBE.

Date: Mon Nov 13 2:04 PM, 2006

were we at the same comp? If CA has all this, where the heck was it? I saw lots of errors...and not as much tumbling as last year. I am sure they will get better, but as for now, I think they were just ok. Who said they got a 99? I seriously doubt that! If so, something is wrong with my vision! I LOVE watching CA, but lets be real folks!