WORLDS 2007

Date: Tue Jul 25 3:25 PM, 2006

RE: WORLDS 2007

Date: Tue Jul 25 5:56 PM, 2006

ouch wrote:

That last part was a little harsh don't you think?

Drew called himself that "Cheer Whore"......

Date: Tue Jul 25 5:58 PM, 2006

I had an idea wrote:

I wanted to go look at CCT's results from last year, just to see who they competed against, etc.

I haven't ever heard of a single one of these companies except USA and GSSA (where they took 3rd at both of these). Is it odd that I've been a part of cheer in California for almost 10 years now and have never heard of:

Spirit Club
US Spiritleaders
Cheerpros

Those are the companies that Twisters "thought" they had a chance to win at......LOL
??

What is the reputation/competitiveness of these competition companies? I already know about USA and GSSA *rolls eyes*

Date: Tue Jul 25 6:01 PM, 2006

To I had an idea wrote:

I had an idea wrote:
I wanted to go look at CCT's results from last year, just to see who they competed against, etc.

I haven't ever heard of a single one of these companies except USA and GSSA (where they took 3rd at both of these). Is it odd that I've been a part of cheer in California for almost 10 years now and have never heard of:

Spirit Club
US Spiritleaders
Cheerpros

Those are the companies that Twisters "thought" they had a chance to win at......LOL
??

What is the reputation/competitiveness of these competition companies? I already know about USA and GSSA *rolls eyes*

I agree...CTC competed at the easiest, unheard of competitions thinking that they had a "chance" of "winning"......Hope to see them at some "Real Competitions" this year....Hopefully they'll surprise us!

Date: Wed Jul 26 10:44 AM, 2006

Gosh, where is all the boasting now that the truth is out for all to see? Interesting!

Date: Wed Jul 26 8:21 PM, 2006

I actually believe that a coach or the owner of the gym has been posting all this stuff. Now this is how rumors are started, so I'm just letting you all know this is my opinion. The facts that lead me to this are that some of the posts from the same name things are said that only the owners or coaches would still say. But this is just my opinion I have no concrete facts so don't go calling their owners and going fljk;aslgfajljagfio;s.

Date: Fri Jul 28 7:19 PM, 2006

It's unfortunite wrote:

This kid is new to California Allstars and it's unfortunite that he doesn't/hasn't learned yet that California Allstars don't trash talk like he is doing. Especially about teams that members weren't once a part of. But his comments would be a testiment of either his upbringing or what was acceptable at his old gym. In any case, the good people down at California Allstars have their hands full with this one. For sure.

Californis Allstars have always set a very good example and showed great sportmanship, for the most part. Don't let this guy bring you down.

Date: Tue Aug 1 6:00 AM, 2006

I would like to make an additional comment about competitions. There are over 100 companies and about 50 of them offer cheerleading events in California. Everyone is not waiting for CA, Power,cheergyms.com, NCE, So Cal, OC all stars, and American to make their schedule. They make the schedule based upon their own value system. Not everyone likes Americas Best, CTC, USA or Spirit Sports. Some do and some like to compete in other places for good reason.

Date: Tue Aug 1 9:27 AM, 2006

im confused, why did u bring up comps and companies?

Date: Tue Aug 1 9:03 PM, 2006

Competitions wrote:

I would like to make an additional comment about competitions. There are over 100 companies and about 50 of them offer cheerleading events in California. Everyone is not waiting for CA, Power,cheergyms.com, NCE, So Cal, OC all stars, and American to make their schedule. They make the schedule based upon their own value system. Not everyone likes Americas Best, CTC, USA or Spirit Sports. Some do and some like to compete in other places for good reason.

do you really think oc is actually good enough to "hang" with ca, power, and american? maybe cg but not the powerhouses! they just arent up there yet. not saying they wont be, but they have a lot of catching up before they can "hang with the other powerhouses!

Date: Tue Aug 1 9:14 PM, 2006

I also wondered why OC was thrown in there, since they didn't have a level 5 team that was even close to a World bid. But now that there will be a Junior division at Worlds, maybe! We'll wait and see.

Date: Tue Aug 1 9:16 PM, 2006

hold up hold up, what are you trying to say about Cheergyms?

Date: Tue Aug 1 11:25 PM, 2006

You know what??? I have to say thanks for saying that we wern't up there with the powerhouses without being mean. Now THAT'S the way you're supposed to state your opinion that isn't "for" someone withouth being mean. And I'm NOT being sarcastic. I am truly impressed.

No, I would have to agree that we aren't up there quite yet. We are truly working on that, and do have two level 5 teams, but we are really really working hard!!! Thanks to the poster who remembered us also!!! Just when I think things could go in the wrong direction, someone or many someones amaze me!!!!

OC

Date: Wed Aug 2 11:20 AM, 2006

Alex wrote:

hold up hold up, what are you trying to say about Cheergyms?

what im trying to say about cg is they arent up there either. they have to catch up too! i know that they can if they keep going in the direction they are, but their not quite there yet.

Date: Wed Aug 2 12:09 PM, 2006

you know what? you can stop dissing cheergyms on our message boards

Date: Wed Aug 2 12:45 PM, 2006

so if this was pro x i could say whatever i wanted? that is bs!

Date: Wed Aug 2 1:07 PM, 2006

I don't think they were "dissing" cheergyms.com. They gave their opinion in a constructive manner. If you want to be considered amounst the best you have to work for it and remove ALL doubt. Have we done that yet CG? Nope.

Date: Wed Aug 2 2:53 PM, 2006

well i thought we were pretty close given that if you looked at Worlds Motions was right behind California all stars and looking at worlds both all american and motions could hang with American. so i think we can HANG with some of those teams... i didnt mean anything negative in my last post even though it sounded negative. i was rather looking for an explanation because i didnt understand where it was coming from.

Date: Wed Aug 2 10:13 PM, 2006

Alex wrote:

well i thought we were pretty close given that if you looked at Worlds Motions was right behind California all stars and looking at worlds both all american and motions could hang with American. so i think we can HANG with some of those teams... i didnt mean anything negative in my last post even though it sounded negative. i was rather looking for an explanation because i didnt understand where it was coming from.

I think you are tooting your horn a little too much! And besides, California Allstars looked like crap at worlds this year. And American is still better than you. . .

Date: Wed Aug 2 10:52 PM, 2006

Yup so true. Not all cali all stars teams were bad though, but the one that went to worlds much worse then normal. I'm sure they will be back up this year though.