i dont think AA:


should have beat:
cf rockies:


OR
SBE:

i agree

clearly the two other teams have more difficulty.

SBE:
-full team kick doubles
-8 doubles on the floor
-6 standing fulls
-all partner stunts
-full team tucks

CF:
-4 standing fulls
-like 10 3-to fulls
-difficult stunt, with dips
-full team pike tucks and toe handspring tucks
-and overall and exciting routine

AA:
-no full team standing tucks
-only 1 standing full
-re-use their tumbling A LOT
- only 3 doubles
-partner stunt was good but had a HUGE mistake, (stunts are bigger than tumbling mistakes usually)
-only one kick double
-and overall their routine just wasnt as exciting as the other 2

i think it was clear. that gssa just likes the "nor-cal" style cuz thats exactly what cg.com is. cf and sbe are definatly more of the so-cal style.

You should be a judge wrote:

---

Obviously you all should be judges, since the judges so obviously missed out. I mean...wow, all that talent. How could the judges have missed it?

"Bitter, party for (insert number of bitter cheerleaders, parents and fans here), your table is ready!"

---

you just dont get the fact that it sucks when either your team or another team is cheated out f something they deserved more than another team! "your order of intelligence is ready!"

i agree wrote:

---

SBE:
-full team kick doubles
-8 doubles on the floor
-6 standing fulls
-all partner stunts
-full team tucks

---

Whoa whoa, hold on here.

There were 12 boys on that team. I would NOT call 6 partner stunts "all partner stunts" or 6 kick doubles "full team kick doubles". With 30 kids on the floor, there should be 9 or 10 stunts in the air, not 6. SBE had great tumbling, but they were out-stunted by every other team in the Super Six. When a small all-girl team can put up 5 stunts, there's no way a large co-ed team should only be putting up 6.

The doubles were the edge for SBE, but then one of them face-planted in the front left corner (I assume it was supposed to be a double, because it was too close to the corner to tumble out of a 1.5), and the other that biffed it in the back right corner. There was also a touchdown in the front right corner, a half-twist belly-down where they should have been a double in the pyramid...it's easy to point out other mistakes without pointing out your own. AA's one belly-flop in the stunt sequence (which, I am not from SBE OR Cheergyms) was not a "HUGE mistake" - it was the same as the half-twist bellydown from SBE IMO. They put up 7 stunts in SMALL coed, and other than the belly-flop, the only other even minor mistake in the routine (I'm watching video as I type) was a touchdown in tumbling in the front left corner in the last stunt sequence.

So I think a more fair comparison looks like this:

SBE (large coed):
6 kick doubles
8 doubles, 1 incomplete w/fall, 1 complete with fall
1 touchdown in cross tumbling
6 standing fulls
6 partner stunts, 2 positions
belly-down/incomplete twist in pyramid
full team tucks

AA (small coed):
5 kick doubles (I don't know what the heck you are looking at - there are 2 individual ones and 3 at one time)
3 doubles
1 touchdown in tumbling
1 standing full
7 partner stunts, 1 w/early cradle/incomplete twist
A CLEAN routine with well-choreographed transitions and no one running around like they're on fire to get to their next spot

So while sure, SBE had the difficulty edge in tumbling, they also botched some of it (two BAD falls and a touchdown). They did NOT have the edge in difficulty in stunts, neither in numbers or in skill difficulty.

And when you compare large versus small...the rest of the numbers pan out. SBE had 12 boys to AA's 4. There's going to be a difference in tumbling and should be in stunts between large and small coed. It's hard to compare because it's like comparing apples and oranges. But just in comparison - large all girl teams put up 9 stunts at Worlds.

actually they were 6 kick kick doubles.

what the heck is with the "dark lady" head shake?

Bryan wrote:

---

My name is Br-Y-an not Br-I-an, and the way you intended to use the word "your" was grammatically incorrect!

"not looking real inteligent" is not a possesion, therefore you cannot use "your" before it! "YOU'RE not looking real inteligent" would be proper!


Sorry, twy o fmy biggest pet peeves are when people spell my name wrong and when the spell things (like your and you're, there, their, and they're, accept and except, etc) wrong.

Bryan

Are you kidding me ? Relax BrYan

---

stop picking on him

i agree wrote:

---

i agree

clearly the two other teams have more difficulty.

SBE:
-full team kick doubles
-8 doubles on the floor
-6 standing fulls
-all partner stunts
-full team tucks

CF:
-4 standing fulls
-like 10 3-to fulls
-difficult stunt, with dips
-full team pike tucks and toe handspring tucks
-and overall and exciting routine

AA:
-no full team standing tucks
-only 1 standing full
-re-use their tumbling A LOT
- only 3 doubles
-partner stunt was good but had a HUGE mistake, (stunts are bigger than tumbling mistakes usually)
-only one kick double
-and overall their routine just wasnt as exciting as the other 2

i think it was clear. that gssa just likes the "nor-cal" style cuz thats exactly what cg.com is. cf and sbe are definatly more of the so-cal style.

---

SBE
-Had full team kick doubles but 3 of them were sloppy
-6 standing fulls, but they usually barely land (Still a hard skill, I give them that)
-overall execution of routine needed to be 10 times better, plus transitions were slow with many people running instead of going right into their spot

Cheer Force
-routine was very entertaining
-Double downs need to be squared off before they pull the wrap
-Yes their stunts were difficult but most of their flyers were in 6th grade. Its different having 1 or 2, but almost all of them were youth or jr. age
-Amazing routine for the most part, but I wasn't a big fan of their dance. Also some of their music choices were a a little scarey. That's not a skill but does effect overall impression.