Why are you all so bitter that cheergyms got a bid? WE ARE NOT THE JUDGES.

JUDGES have the power to decide who goes to worlds and who doesn't. , NOT YOU. If you disagree with the judges, then you ar eprobably wrong, because the judges know best! If the judges believed that All American deserved a bid and not YOUR team, get over it already! If you dont like the compettion scoring system, let your coach know about it and request that you dont attend it the following year, sheesh!


Bryan
Motions Large Coed
CG.C All American Small Coed

you're*

Brian Ya better slow down buddy your not looking real inteligent.

After watching All American, Cheergyms.com totally deserved their bid. They had multiple fulls, solid motions, clean execution of most skills, and just a solid routine. Now they could of had faster transitions and stepped up their flexiblity, but they still were very good. If you want a bid, work hard like them and go get one!

---

I disagree there tumbling was not enough to play with the big dogs. You need more fulls then they had . Execution was not where it should have been. I cant even remember 1 memrable thing about that routine. But I have plenty of memories about the other teams I saw.

Blah wrote:

---

After watching All American, Cheergyms.com totally deserved their bid. They had multiple fulls, solid motions, clean execution of most skills, and just a solid routine. Now they could of had faster transitions and stepped up their flexiblity, but they still were very good. If you want a bid, work hard like them and go get one!

I disagree there tumbling was not enough to play with the big dogs. You need more fulls then they had . Execution was not where it should have been. I cant even remember 1 memrable thing about that routine. But I have plenty of memories about the other teams I saw.

---

are you talking about GSSA? what memories are you talking about?

I know you arent talking about POWER SMALLS off performance compared to their large (which my guess is why they chose to have their large go first because they knew LARGE had a better shot at winning against coed teams) or SBE's performance with people falling on the ground so much it looked like it was choreographed?

Last time i checked those are the only two teams who didnt get a bid from GSSA.

and who cares what you guys are talking about saying AA didnt have anything imppressive, they got their, they got 14 out of 24 and there were a number of people who said AA was amazing. and those people include coaches from some of the top name teams. enough said

blow this message off all you want but who cares

GSSA? wrote:

---

Blah wrote:




After watching All American, Cheergyms.com totally deserved their bid. They had multiple fulls, solid motions, clean execution of most skills, and just a solid routine. Now they could of had faster transitions and stepped up their flexiblity, but they still were very good. If you want a bid, work hard like them and go get one!

I disagree there tumbling was not enough to play with the big dogs. You need more fulls then they had . Execution was not where it should have been. I cant even remember 1 memrable thing about that routine. But I have plenty of memories about the other teams I saw.



are you talking about GSSA? what memories are you talking about?

I know you arent talking about POWER SMALLS off performance compared to their large (which my guess is why they chose to have their large go first because they knew LARGE had a better shot at winning against coed teams) or SBE's performance with people falling on the ground so much it looked like it was choreographed?

Last time i checked those are the only two teams who didnt get a bid from GSSA.

and who cares what you guys are talking about saying AA didnt have anything imppressive, they got their, they got 14 out of 24 and there were a number of people who said AA was amazing. and those people include coaches from some of the top name teams. enough said

blow this message off all you want but who cares

---

actually we only had two tumbling falls. Yes they were two big falls one in our opening and one in the 1st sequence tumbling but our performance was still awesome and felt good stepping off the floor and thats all that matters.

Seriously, some people have said the rudest things on here. I can't even imagine some of the things you guys say. I have been around cheerleading for a long time and the All American team did DESERVE what they got. They did 7 Stretch to scorp double downs and fulls just about everywhere. Everyone can't be Gym Tyme or Spirit of Texas. Those teams were in a league of their own in that division. Saying that doesn't mean all those other gyms didn't deserve to go. You need to look at cheerleading in the WHOLE picture and not just what YOU think is important.

Ya I love South Bay, but they were sloppy, transitions were sloppy and they made MANY mistakes. Its great to have difficulty but its NOT open gym, its competition. If you don't have it , then don't do it. Don't expect to get rewarded for sloppy skills and say "but we did it" to get 1st place. Cheer doesn't work like that. You can either get with the program or join another sport.

Why would you be so rude to imply that these other rude comments are from SBE Isn't that just as rude. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHO IS WRITING THESE COMMENTS.

My name is Br-Y-an not Br-I-an, and the way you intended to use the word "your" was grammatically incorrect!

"not looking real inteligent" is not a possesion, therefore you cannot use "your" before it! "YOU'RE not looking real inteligent" would be proper!


Sorry, twy o fmy biggest pet peeves are when people spell my name wrong and when the spell things (like your and you're, there, their, and they're, accept and except, etc) wrong.

Bryan