I just wish that when they made this scoring rubric that they would have made it more detailed. I don't think consistency is going to be achieved when the rubric is so broad. I liked the spirit sports grid from last season. They should have used something like that. It was much more effective. For ex: (this is not EXACTLY how it was, but something along these lines) -
Level 5 - JUMPS out of 10 points.
9.2 - 9.5 jump variety and majority team performs 1 jumps to tuck
9.5 - 9.8 jump variety and majority team performs 2 jumps to tuck
9.8 - 10.0 jump variety and majority team performs 3 jumps to tuck
... ... and I believe you could even score a .1 over if you did something "elite."
This makes more sense. Difficulty and execution come into play. So if majority of my team did a sloppy 3 jumps to tuck, or it was off timing, then at least the lowest score, we could receive was a 9.8. And if "Team A all stars" performed a 2 jumps to tuck, but only twelve did it, but they were on time and executed well, then they would recieve the higher score in the second bracket, receiving a 9.8. THIS makes sense. Not explaining, not having proof, and just giving a score doesn't allow for a fair result across the board. I wish they would have used this rubric. I loved it. And like I said that's not exactly how it went but it was along those lines. There was room for execution to out-do difficulty, but also put difficulty where it should have been - at the top.